Buy & Sell

March 2024

What 'priced to sell' actually means — and when it works against you

James Harlow is the founder of Aurum. For a direct valuation conversation, contact james@aurumproperty.co.uk

James Harlow is the founder of Aurum. For a direct valuation conversation, contact james@aurumproperty.co.uk

James Harlow is the founder of Aurum. For a direct valuation conversation, contact james@aurumproperty.co.uk

The phrase we hear too often

"We just want to price it to sell."

It sounds reasonable. It sounds like a seller who is realistic, unattached, ready to move on. In practice, it often means something different — and the outcome, more often than not, is a sale at less than the property was worth.

Here's why.


What 'priced to sell' usually means

When most sellers say they want to price to sell, they mean one of three things. They mean they've had a bad experience sitting on the market too long and they don't want to repeat it. They mean they've been told by an agent that pricing low generates competition and competition drives the price up. Or they mean they're in a hurry — a chain, a life event, a deadline — and they're willing to leave money on the table to get certainty.

The first two are worth examining. The third is a genuine trade-off that some sellers need to make, and if certainty and speed are the priority, pricing aggressively to generate immediate interest is a legitimate strategy. But it should be a conscious decision, made with clear eyes about what it costs — not a default position dressed up as realism.


The 'price low to generate competition' argument

The theory is straightforward. Price below market value, attract multiple buyers simultaneously, create a competitive environment, and watch the offers push the price above where you would have listed it anyway. It works in specific conditions — a market with very high demand, very low supply, and a product that appeals to a wide buyer pool.

In prime central London, at the level Aurum operates, those conditions exist occasionally and are absent most of the time. The buyer pool for a £4M Chelsea townhouse is not large enough for a competitive bidding process to develop reliably. The buyers at this level are sophisticated enough to recognise when a property is priced below its value — and rather than competing harder, they tend to ask why. What's wrong with it? Why are they in a hurry? What are we not seeing?

Pricing low in a thin market doesn't create competition. It creates suspicion. And suspicion at the top end of the market is expensive.


What actually drives a fast, clean sale

In eighteen years, the properties that have sold fastest and closest to their potential value share three characteristics that have nothing to do with pricing below market.

First, they were prepared. Not necessarily renovated — but presented honestly at their best. Professionally photographed, properly described, with any obvious issues either addressed or disclosed clearly. Buyers at this level will find everything eventually. Surfacing it yourself, early, builds the trust that keeps transactions together.

Second, they were priced correctly — not low, not high, correctly. A correct price for a prime London property is one that a well-informed buyer, looking at comparable transactions, would consider fair. It leaves nothing on the table and it doesn't invite the suspicion that underpricing creates. Getting to that number requires knowing the market, not running an algorithm.

Third, they were introduced to the right buyers first. Not listed publicly on day one and left to find their own audience, but quietly shown to the buyers most likely to want them before the broader market saw them. That process — matching a property to a buyer pool before it goes live — is the part of what we do that most sellers don't see and most portals can't replicate.


The question worth asking

Before you decide to price your property to sell, ask what you're actually optimising for. If it's speed and certainty, pricing aggressively might be right. If it's achieving the best possible outcome — which for most sellers is the maximum price in a reasonable timeframe — it almost certainly isn't.

The valuation conversation we have at Aurum isn't about telling sellers what they want to hear. It's about giving them an honest number and an honest explanation of how we get there. Sometimes that number is lower than the seller expected. Sometimes it's higher. But it's always based on what the market will actually pay — which is the only number that matters.

The phrase we hear too often

"We just want to price it to sell."

It sounds reasonable. It sounds like a seller who is realistic, unattached, ready to move on. In practice, it often means something different — and the outcome, more often than not, is a sale at less than the property was worth.

Here's why.


What 'priced to sell' usually means

When most sellers say they want to price to sell, they mean one of three things. They mean they've had a bad experience sitting on the market too long and they don't want to repeat it. They mean they've been told by an agent that pricing low generates competition and competition drives the price up. Or they mean they're in a hurry — a chain, a life event, a deadline — and they're willing to leave money on the table to get certainty.

The first two are worth examining. The third is a genuine trade-off that some sellers need to make, and if certainty and speed are the priority, pricing aggressively to generate immediate interest is a legitimate strategy. But it should be a conscious decision, made with clear eyes about what it costs — not a default position dressed up as realism.


The 'price low to generate competition' argument

The theory is straightforward. Price below market value, attract multiple buyers simultaneously, create a competitive environment, and watch the offers push the price above where you would have listed it anyway. It works in specific conditions — a market with very high demand, very low supply, and a product that appeals to a wide buyer pool.

In prime central London, at the level Aurum operates, those conditions exist occasionally and are absent most of the time. The buyer pool for a £4M Chelsea townhouse is not large enough for a competitive bidding process to develop reliably. The buyers at this level are sophisticated enough to recognise when a property is priced below its value — and rather than competing harder, they tend to ask why. What's wrong with it? Why are they in a hurry? What are we not seeing?

Pricing low in a thin market doesn't create competition. It creates suspicion. And suspicion at the top end of the market is expensive.


What actually drives a fast, clean sale

In eighteen years, the properties that have sold fastest and closest to their potential value share three characteristics that have nothing to do with pricing below market.

First, they were prepared. Not necessarily renovated — but presented honestly at their best. Professionally photographed, properly described, with any obvious issues either addressed or disclosed clearly. Buyers at this level will find everything eventually. Surfacing it yourself, early, builds the trust that keeps transactions together.

Second, they were priced correctly — not low, not high, correctly. A correct price for a prime London property is one that a well-informed buyer, looking at comparable transactions, would consider fair. It leaves nothing on the table and it doesn't invite the suspicion that underpricing creates. Getting to that number requires knowing the market, not running an algorithm.

Third, they were introduced to the right buyers first. Not listed publicly on day one and left to find their own audience, but quietly shown to the buyers most likely to want them before the broader market saw them. That process — matching a property to a buyer pool before it goes live — is the part of what we do that most sellers don't see and most portals can't replicate.


The question worth asking

Before you decide to price your property to sell, ask what you're actually optimising for. If it's speed and certainty, pricing aggressively might be right. If it's achieving the best possible outcome — which for most sellers is the maximum price in a reasonable timeframe — it almost certainly isn't.

The valuation conversation we have at Aurum isn't about telling sellers what they want to hear. It's about giving them an honest number and an honest explanation of how we get there. Sometimes that number is lower than the seller expected. Sometimes it's higher. But it's always based on what the market will actually pay — which is the only number that matters.

The phrase we hear too often

"We just want to price it to sell."

It sounds reasonable. It sounds like a seller who is realistic, unattached, ready to move on. In practice, it often means something different — and the outcome, more often than not, is a sale at less than the property was worth.

Here's why.


What 'priced to sell' usually means

When most sellers say they want to price to sell, they mean one of three things. They mean they've had a bad experience sitting on the market too long and they don't want to repeat it. They mean they've been told by an agent that pricing low generates competition and competition drives the price up. Or they mean they're in a hurry — a chain, a life event, a deadline — and they're willing to leave money on the table to get certainty.

The first two are worth examining. The third is a genuine trade-off that some sellers need to make, and if certainty and speed are the priority, pricing aggressively to generate immediate interest is a legitimate strategy. But it should be a conscious decision, made with clear eyes about what it costs — not a default position dressed up as realism.


The 'price low to generate competition' argument

The theory is straightforward. Price below market value, attract multiple buyers simultaneously, create a competitive environment, and watch the offers push the price above where you would have listed it anyway. It works in specific conditions — a market with very high demand, very low supply, and a product that appeals to a wide buyer pool.

In prime central London, at the level Aurum operates, those conditions exist occasionally and are absent most of the time. The buyer pool for a £4M Chelsea townhouse is not large enough for a competitive bidding process to develop reliably. The buyers at this level are sophisticated enough to recognise when a property is priced below its value — and rather than competing harder, they tend to ask why. What's wrong with it? Why are they in a hurry? What are we not seeing?

Pricing low in a thin market doesn't create competition. It creates suspicion. And suspicion at the top end of the market is expensive.


What actually drives a fast, clean sale

In eighteen years, the properties that have sold fastest and closest to their potential value share three characteristics that have nothing to do with pricing below market.

First, they were prepared. Not necessarily renovated — but presented honestly at their best. Professionally photographed, properly described, with any obvious issues either addressed or disclosed clearly. Buyers at this level will find everything eventually. Surfacing it yourself, early, builds the trust that keeps transactions together.

Second, they were priced correctly — not low, not high, correctly. A correct price for a prime London property is one that a well-informed buyer, looking at comparable transactions, would consider fair. It leaves nothing on the table and it doesn't invite the suspicion that underpricing creates. Getting to that number requires knowing the market, not running an algorithm.

Third, they were introduced to the right buyers first. Not listed publicly on day one and left to find their own audience, but quietly shown to the buyers most likely to want them before the broader market saw them. That process — matching a property to a buyer pool before it goes live — is the part of what we do that most sellers don't see and most portals can't replicate.


The question worth asking

Before you decide to price your property to sell, ask what you're actually optimising for. If it's speed and certainty, pricing aggressively might be right. If it's achieving the best possible outcome — which for most sellers is the maximum price in a reasonable timeframe — it almost certainly isn't.

The valuation conversation we have at Aurum isn't about telling sellers what they want to hear. It's about giving them an honest number and an honest explanation of how we get there. Sometimes that number is lower than the seller expected. Sometimes it's higher. But it's always based on what the market will actually pay — which is the only number that matters.

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.